I teie nei e mea rahi no'ano'a


Transcript of Donald J .Trump and Constitutional Litigation Partnership

July 7, 2021.

-Brooke Rollins
Other faces, I am the president and CEO of the American First Policy Institute. And before we founded along with our chairman Linda McMahon, and Larry Kudlow, the America First Policy Institute, I had the honor and privilege of working for President. Donald Trump as his domestic policy adviser in the White House. My most important title though isn't any of those, whatever my role I am an American first, a wife, a mother, a daughter. Her a sister, a neighbor, and entrepreneur with everything that being. An American means it is that imperative of citizenship that brings us here. Today, the post-presidency is usually a relaxing time for president. You get to settle down a bit. Write your Memoirs, maybe sign a Netflix deal. That's what most presidents do. But of course, what most presidents do. Who has never described Donald J, Trump people who love Donald Trump. And people who don't all agree on one thing, he makes history. And he's making history again, today as you'll hear from him shortly,


But the president would agree with me when I say that focusing on him today. Misses the point back during his presidency. I remember him saying more than once that in reality. They're not really after me. They're after you and the America, we know and love. And I am just standing in the way. There's no topic on which they the elites, the Big Farms, the progressives, the office holders, And the bureaucrats. There is no other topic that they are seeing as a bigger obstacle to achieve their Ambitions than the first amendment. The First Amendment, the bulwark of our liberties is what enables us. As citizens to resist them at every turn, the First Amendment truly stands between them and us. When they try to tell us what to read, the first amendment gets in their way when they try to tell us. Us. What you think the First Amendment gets in their way when they try to tell us what to believe, the First Amendment gets in their way. And when they try to tell us with whom to worship with whom to associate with whom to congregate and with whom to be friends, the First Amendment gets in their way, it's no surprise. Then that they want the First Amendment gone, they don't advocate for abolition, of course, they know better than that.

But they do advocate for curtailing it into meaninglessness. Nowhere, is that more evident than in the suppression of First Amendment rights online. In just a minute, the President will talk about this and what he intends to do about it. If enough for me to say this what was just a decade back, a meme fiction of paranoid. Dystopia. A handful of technology companies. Effectively seizing control of the American public square is now our own present reality. Against them, this President fights for you as he always has and as he always will, ultimately the issue at hand is the same issue that has gripped, the nation. And since the day almost exactly six years ago, when Donald Trump made his famous escalator ride into history. Becoming candidate Trump and the nominee Trump and then President Trump the issue is simply this, it was then it is today. Who rules in America? Is it a handful of unaccountable and unelected Elites who concoct and enforce standards arbitrarily if so we should pack up the An experiment called The American Dream, done issue, aristocratic titles and be done with the charade or are the rulers of this country still the people. The Democratic citizenry, the men, and women who do honest work every single day and ask only for a fair and Equitable treatment in return. We need that answer this country. Just finished an Independence. Day celebration.

Where we talked about. Been celebrated, everything. We have been and everything. We have meant as a country for the sake of future Independence days. For the sake of future American Generations. We must fight for the people's rule. That's what Donald Trump is here to do, and that's what he's always done. Please help me. Welcome President. Donald J Trump.


-Donald J. Trump
Thank you very much, appreciate. Thank you everybody. I just want to say that I stand before you this morning to announce a very important. And very beautiful, I think development for our freedom and our freedom of speech and that goes to all Americans. Today in conjunction with the America First Policy Institute, I'm filing as the lead plas representative a major class action. It against the Big Tech Giants, including Facebook, Google and Twitter as well as their CEOs Mark, Zuckerberg, Sundar Pichai, and Jack Dorsey, 3 real, nice guys.


We're asking the US District Court for the southern district of Florida to order an immediate halt to social media. Companies, illegal shameful censorship of the American people. And that's exactly what they are doing. We're demanding an end to the shadow banning, a stop to the silencing, and a stop to the blacklisting banishing, and canceling that you know so well. Case will prove this censorship is unlawful. It's unconstitutional and it's completely unamerican. We all know that we know that very, very well filing also seeks injunctive relief to allow prompt restitution. And really restoration and you can name about 20 other things that it has to be prompt because it's destroying our country of my accounts. In addition, we are asking the court to impose punitive damages on these social media Giants were going to hold big Tech, very accountable. This is the first of numerous other lawsuits. I assumed that would follow but this is the lead and I think it's going to be very very important game changer for our country. It will be a pivotal battle in the defensive, the First Amendment and in the And I am confident that we will achieve a historic victory for American freedom and at the same time, freedom of speech.


So I want to thank all of the exceptional legal team behind this effort. In particular, John Coale, we have a lot of the tobacco lawyers. You know I said who would have best lawyers? Well, the tobacco Laura seemed to do a very good job. So I figured let's see if they want to do it and they really wanted to do it. We have great great talent. I also want to thank Brooke Rollins just an outstanding person and friend, she's carrying it out to a level that. Nobody saw and she's done it very quickly together with Linda McMahon, a tremendous least successful woman who did an incredible job in the administration, one of the best and everyone at the America First policy Institute for their support of this vital initiative from the very beginning of our nation. Freedom of speech, has always been understood as a Bedrock of our liberty liberty, and our strength, In America, we recognize that the freedom to speak our minds and express the truth. That is our heart, really? That's really a big chunk of our heart. It is our heart is not granted to us, by government. That's given to us by God and no one should have the power to take that right away.


The founding fathers. Others inscribed this right in the very first amendment to our constitution because they knew that free speech is essential to the prevention and look to the prevention of horror, and to the preservation of our Republic. But remember the words, the prevention of horror because we're very close to seeing that now, in our country. we've never been in a position like this and it's all happened very quickly in the words of the father of our country. Although some would like to take that title away from him, George Washington. He will not be canceled. If freedom of speech.


Your freedom of speech may be taken away then dumb and Silent. We may be led like sheep to the slaughter.[Quote by G.Washington] Pretty well-known phrase, and so true. Unfortunately today, this fundamental American right, "I'm a liberty" is under incredible threat and attack by a lot of different sides. But we are the majority side by a lot. I believe we are the majority side by far more than anybody would understand. You just have to take a look at what happened in recent elections and add up the right numbers. You will see a majority, like, you wouldn't believe because nobody can believe what some of the things that are being said, our nobody believes that social media has given extraordinary power to a group of Big Tech Giants. That are working with government, the mainstream media, and a large segment of a political party to silence and suppress the views of the American people.
And they've been very, very successful at that, not in all cases, but in many cases totally successful. While the social media companies are officially private entities in recent years, they have ceased to be private with the enactment and their Oracle use of section 230. Which profoundly protects them from liability? Once they got section 230, then I private companies anymore and a lot of views. No. Other companies in our country. And even in our country's history have had protection like this. It's in effect, a massive government, subsidy these companies have been co-opted coerced and weaponized by government and by government actors too. Become the enforces of illegal unconstitutional censorship. And that's what it is at the highest level censorship. And so many other things that perhaps are even worse and you'll be seeing that and this lawsuit as it Wells its way through the courts. We have all seen Democrats in Congress Hall. The CEOs of these companies before their committees and attempt to threaten Bully them and intimidate them like nobody has been intimidated. But they made a deal, they all get along very nicely now, thank you very much.
Congress has repeatedly told Big Tech that if they do not silence Democrats, political opponents ban prominent conservative voices. I wonder who that would be and restrict what the left ominously labels as disinformation and they are the greatest disinformation group of people ever, ever in the world. As an example just recently. Now they're saying, we never said, defund the police, we want to fund the police. They looked at poll numbers at 85% against them. No, no, no. We want to, we want to take care of the police state. No, they don't. They wanted to fund the police and they'll say it thousands and thousands and thousands of times. And by the end of 12 months, you'll all be saying, oh, they love the police. They don't love the police. They actually hate the police for what. It's a terrible thing and so many other things is changing their views on so many other things and they just say the opposite. They don't even go to anything. They just all in unison. A lot of the people sitting right before me, understand exactly what I'm saying, they say it right before you that we want to do this. We want to do that. It's the exact opposite of what they've been saying, or the very probably the most famous of all Russia, Russia, Russia, Trump loves Russia, he loves Russia, he loves Putin, he loves Russia. And that went on for two years and some people believed it, but we are going to look so closely. And we're going to make sure that the liability protections that they have under Section 230 is at a very minimum changed, and maybe at a maximum taken away, the Supreme Court has made it exceedingly clear that Congress is not allowed to coerce private entities into doing what Congress does. And they're not allowed to do it. The lawful authority is just not there. They can't do it, they bully and they coerce yet. That's exactly what's taking place every single day. It's a flagrant violation of the Constitution going on before our very eyes. And I hate to say this, but they do it with the Supreme Court to they play the riffs. They play their rafts, they talked about all sorts of things are going to do, two supreme court justices, we're going to impeach him, we're going to impeach him, we're going to impeach him and then lo and behold all of a sudden, different decisions come out, or we're going to enlarge that Court to a level that nobody can believe. We are going to take that court and we're going to enlarge, we going to, we're going to have sixteen, we're going to have 20.
We can, I saw one the other day we can have. Twenty four justices. And I guess things happen because all of a sudden decisions come out, they play The riff they play the riff better than Bobby. Knight has ever played the riff. And we can't let that happen. And hopefully our Supreme Court Justices and other judges and justices. They stand up for our values, and they don't let that happen. In addition, in recent years, we have also seen increasing coordination between Big Tech Giants and government agencies such as the Centers for Disease Control with so much was wrong. So many things could have been different, but Big Tech happened to choose the wrong side, and they banned the right side. For example, YouTube's policy explicitly forbids contradicting, quote, Health authorities. You know, the health authorities. Fortunately, I overrode the health authorities quite a bit. I was a lot of good decisions made by didn't we would have been in much Bigger trouble. Like you see? Other countries right now are still in very, very big trouble through such coordination. The federal government is essentially deputize. Social media platforms, to become the de facto censorship arm of the US government, which is exactly what's happened. This was especially clear during the pandemic when social media, Giants began censoring information according to guidance by the CDC, which Which as we now know was very often incorrect or wrong. This censorship is yet another blatant violation of the Constitution. There's so many violations of our Constitution and you'll see that in the suit, which will also be added to because other things are happening on a daily basis that will be added as we go along, consider just some of the information that has been censored in America over the past year. Until recently Facebook had a policy to eliminate all Post sharing evidence that the horrible virus emerged from China. They said it didn't emerge from the Chinese lab Wuhan. Remember I said wanna was like a bomb went up? Wuhan came from the Wuhan lab course. They were body bags. All outside the lab nobody ever mentioned said, I wonder why they said he came a thousand miles away from a back or it came from another country. They tried to blame Italy, they tried to blame us, but they gave that one up, that was also misinformation. But then it was We revealed that this was most likely the truth that it came from the lab and it was a small little story, but when I said it it was like a weapon went off a major weapon, I won't use the word weapon because I never use the word nuclear, but we have to be careful with our leadership because if we don't have the proper leadership with a very perilous state so we don't use the word nuclei never use it. Okay, never use it. I never said it. That's called disinformation Google and YouTube have deleted. Countless videos that dared to question the Judgment of the World Health Organization, which has been wrong. So often it's been a really pipe organ for China, as most of, you know, calling those videos misinformation, including videos that consists of clear, scientific fact, doctors and medical groups have been barred from These platforms for posting about therapeutic, such as hydroxychloroquine, huh?. That's a familiar name. Which now most recent studies say is effective in combating, the virus, 3 cents a pill, the drug companies don't like three sense of pill 3 cents, a pill is what it costs, but recent Studies have come out very strongly. In favor, Twitter has censored users simply for using the term illegal alien, which it has labeled as hateful content and just taking you off for whatever reason.


You have to see the sentence they took me off, or it's the most loving sentence. It's really amazing. They could have done better because I've had a lot worse. I mean, I couldn't believe that was the reason I take a look at it. You know, exactly. The sentence I'm talking has become very famous. People are saying really even the other side said really, and of course, there is no better evidence that Big Tech is out of control than the fact that they banned. The sitting president of the United States. Earlier this year, a band that continues to this day continues. So we get the word out but it's not a fair situation. Very, very bad for this country. Very bad for the world. And if they can do it to me, they can do it to anyone. And in fact that is exactly what they're doing it. Taking people off, we don't even realize they were taken off, they'd have no idea why they were taken off. But what they're doing is incredible and Incredibly dangerous. Joining us this morning are just a few of the many Americans who have been illegally band or silenced under the corrupt regime of censorship.
These Brave Patriots are included in the lawsuit and thousands more are joining as we speak thousands more. they're all wanting to join. This will be I think will go down as the biggest class action ever filed because thousands of people want to join. Jen Horton is a school teacher from Fenton Michigan earlier this year. She was kicked off Facebook for sharing a post questioning. Whether young children should be required to wear masks. You had a question giving both sides and actually not just giving both sides. That was enough. At the same time as Jen was the platform. Her brother, had gone missing and she was unable to get the word out to all of her followers. He had a lot of followers
Could not get the word out and Jen want to. Thank you very much for being here and stepping forward takes a lot of Courage, would you like to come up and say something? Okay, where's Jen?


-Jennifer Horton
I just appreciate the opportunity to be here with all of these amazing Patriots and I thank you President Trump for everything you're doing for us.


Thank you, Jen.

Dr. Kelly Victory. I love that name. I would have gone with that name.


If I had the choice is a board-certified trauma and emergency specialist from Colorado. Great person who was asked by the pastor of the church to prepare a video about To mitigate risks of the China virus to allow church services to safely resume. Just a question. Could you give us some information? The video was outrageously removed from Facebook Twitter and YouTube with horrible, statements being made by them. Kelly, thank you for your bravery. Please say a few words.

...Facebook delayed the flight.


The flights delayed by four hours, I wonder I can't believe that. That's terrible. What what they will do. All right. Thank you anywhere. He's here. He is planning going, into year going into Newark.

Kiyan and Bobby Michael, our angel parents. Their precious son, Brandon was killed at just 21 years of age by a twice deported and very violent, illegal alien.
Because a very fatal Collision. Something should have never happened. Since then, they have heroically launched, their own deeply, personal fight to draw, attention to the dangers of illegal immigration. They helped push through Florida's ban on deadly Sanctuary cities and they are indeed deadly. And they continue to be strong advocates for border security and immigration enforcement, but they have been cruelly and unfairly banned from Twitter, Would you like to say a few words? Where are you? Would you, please?

Thank you mr. President. The fight censorship must continue. We are in this. We will not allow our nation to be silenced. We stand together and we thank you mr. President,

I see somebody running for office. I want to thank you very much. It's really terrific. So we're in a fight. We're in a fight that we're going to win. We're a fight that Want us to take on so many people have said to me, please, sir, do something about big Tech sue them sir Su them and they've been saying it to me for a long time, but there has never been a better time to do it. Polling released by Scott. Rasmussen, highly respected shows that nearly two-thirds of Americans believe. Big tech companies should be required to abide by the First Amendment guarantee of free speech. And I think those numbers are low, very low sixty-eight, percent of Americans believe, social media companies, should prioritize their fair treatment of every citizen over protecting themselves there, they want People Protected, they want people to have their voice and an overwhelming, majority believe that Tech Giants have become too powerful. They've crossed the line many many times. And by far too much, the American people's Birthright of Freedom must Prevail against Big Tech and other forces that seek to destroy it.
Well, this lawsuit, we are standing up for American democracy by standing up for free speech, rights of every American Democrat. Republican independent, whoever it may be This lawsuit is just the beginning. It's a very big suit. With great lawyers. I'll let you know about that in about a year from now, maybe I'll change my mind, but I don't think so. They've had a tremendous track record and doing good. We'll also take this battle to the state legislatures to Congress and ultimately to The Ballot Box, and it will be a very popular one at The Ballot Box. I will never stop fighting to defend constitutional rights and sacred Liberties of the American people. I Never stop. I will now ask John Coale, and Pam Bondi to terrific people that love our country, so much to step forward and discuss the suit, and then we'll take a few questions. Thank you very much.

-John Coale
Hello. He's taller than me. This lawsuit is really about freedom of speech and what it is. It's basic that freedom of speech, depends on certain things. One is who decides what's hate? Who decides what's misinformation? It's not a couple guys out in California. It's always been the Supreme Court for over 200 years and I would say they've done a heck of Job. We are, we're taking this suit. We're going to prove that they are government actors. Therefore the First Amendment does apply. And we think we will be Victorious on that. We think that we're in the right area, which is Southern Florida. And you have to understand that we can't let this happen. Because, you know, for all you out there who are Democrats and liberals or Whatever you are you're next. Now, it's the conservatives but as history shows of it will turn maybe five years from now. Maybe three months from now, maybe 10 years but you're next So I would urge people from the other side of President Trump's political party to join us because you can't have this going on. And one last thing, the most hated Thing, by all the Supreme Court's over all the years is called prior restraint, that means that you can't speak Pentagon. Papers, is the famous case. You can't do this, because we say, so, Supreme Court hates this. They think it's the worst kind of censorship we have and when this gentleman cannot go on and say what he wants to say, that's prior restraint every minute of every day until this thing gets resolved, thank you.

-Pam Bondi
And I'm here not as part of that great legal team over there. But I'm very proud to be part of America First policy constitutional litigation team. So I was here just to explain just a few things. And you know what John said, this is about our constitution, this isn't just for conservatives. This is for our media. This is for everyone out there about censorship, this is for Democrats and even progressives who speech should be protected under The First Amendment, if you recall Tulsi Gabbard, she sued. Do you remember that Tulsi gabbard was censored when she was running for president? And so she sued and you know people say that they have immunity they meaning YouTube, Facebook, Twitter under Section 230. Well here's where that's changed section. 230 came about in 1996 and it was an offshoot of the decency act to protect really to protect against children being exploited on online, that's what this was all about. So take it back to 96. How many users were there? Then probably about 20 million on AOL right? President 1996. Now when we have Facebook Twitter we have billions worldwide. So times have changed the internet is flourishing, but first amendment still must be protected, no one could Envision. What was about to happen with the internet in our country. Now, Billions, billions of users worldwide. So Why? This is so important and when you have Mark Zuckerberg and others being called in front of Congress and being coerced and being questioned by all these congressmen, then you also have Mark Zuckerberg emailing with dr. Fauci about covid. And in fact, a lot of ther emails that we received have been redacted, not just because of phone numbers, but because they were trading "trade secrets," thanks that they were so a private Company is communicating with the federal government and parts of that were redacted. So that makes them. They're not immune anymore. They are not immune anymore, it was coercion collusion working together and they cannot hide from the First Amendment. That's why this is so very, very important. Even Facebook's board, oversight board that Mark Zuckerberg created the oversight board. I'm back and said there were problems, there were problems and it lacked consistently being applied to everyone by community standards. So that's why this is so important for us, for our future, for all political parties. For all human beings around the world.
We believe in the First Amendment and America First Policy will fight for it. Thank you.

Thank you very much. A lot of people ask me about dr. Fauci. I like dr. Fauci. Actually, get along with them. Great, but they said, why didn't you fire? My said, no, he was good. He'd recommend something. I do the opposite and we always turned out to be around sir, don't close the borders to China. We closed them very early. Get no credit for anything. But these are Minor Details, any questions. Christina is why I chose you. Go ahead, please.

-Journalist, Christina.
Sir. So, what are, what is the possibility of a settlement prior to trial, because obviously, any Court ruling in your favor and you've laid out a very compelling case, anything prior to a court ruling, would certainly limit the rest that everybody else was not in the class.

We have looking for a settlement, we don't expect to settlement, they fight and they fight hard. They've never had anything like this and they've never had a team of very attractive looking people in every way. That's a, that's a quite a legal team that's like from a picture. But they are very effective. Much more importantly, legal team, so we're not looking to settle. We don't know what's going to happen but we're not looking to send. Thank you, Christina, thank you. Yeah, please go ahead.

So we are talking about privately held companies that have been censoring. How, what's your position on public broadcasting NPR, who also seemed to be feeling the same kind of role for...

It's such a great question. They are terrible, they are terrible and it's not only what they say, it's what?
Don't say, for instance, I was informed that there are record numbers of murders took place this weekend record numbers. They don't even talk about it on NBC, and CBS, and ABC, and NPR. They don't talk about it. And it's a big, it's a big story. That's why the credibility of the mainstream media is the lowest it's ever been lowest it's ever been. And you know, I hate to take credit for this, but I'm very proud of the fact that I expose them for what What they are? They are terrible terrible, representatives of our country, they don't talk about crime. They don't talk about Chicago, where yet 260 people shot. This weekend that's in Afghanistan. You know, we didn't lose one soldier in the last more than a year. And I will say that was largely because of me, but I won't take credit, but the good news is, I will never be given credit either, but we have a list of some to think of it. 260 people shot in Chicago, massive numbers of people shot in New York and they don't prosecute these people. These are killers, they don't prosecute these people, they have no process. The only go after Republicans, it's a terrible thing that's happening. Our country in a very dangerous thing and a very good question, please.

How you doing? How do you fight the argument that these are private companies?

They can be as liberal as they want to be? Well, they say that their private, but they're no longer private. If they gave up their section, 230, liability protection, I would go along with them and say, they're private, will open up with the privates. Another privates will be opened up. I mean, I know that for a fact because I'm involved in that, but I will say that they are they have section 230. It's A liability. In the likes of which nobody in the history of our country has ever received, just as small group and we're not going to stand for it and that makes them in my opinion, very subject to the kind of penalties that were talking about which is potentially trillions of dollars. It's a number that the likes of which Nobody seen before, John, you might want to address that.

The Supreme Court over the years, specially recently has been very clear what you can and can't do is a private company and they've done it all. There's mainly three reasons the president has talked about community. There's also the corrosion by Congress, Congressman, Congress women in the media and in testimony and in their tweets. And There's also the fact that this law when this law was passed Zuckerberg was in Middle School, okay?
It has served its purpose. It's the, you know, it's now it has grown into this monster that Congress, never intended and the real bottom line is Congress cannot delegate. What it can't do itself and that's what they've done.

You know, it's we were talking earlier about When 230 was created in 1996 and really, I believe, one of the main reasons was something we all care deeply about it as a former Attorney, General getting the sex Predators off instantly yet. Today there are still miss make have come out during the Congressional testimony, but there are still there were over 16 million reports. Still of sex, predators of sex exploitation of Children online, 45 million, Photos and videos that are allegedly still out there. That's what they need to be focusing on.

Thank you, mr. President I think the timing of this is perfect especially going to the midterms and looking ahead to 2024, can you share your thoughts on the timing of it? How that this decision can help protect conservative viewpoints as we move further to 2024 election.

The time. It just seemed to be right because it's so abusive, so bad what they've done, not only to the President of the United States. But to so many others. Hamas has a site. And never reprimanded the never red-flagged than ever nothing. Ever happens the President, and you again, yet, the quote, you won't believe it, but these people call for the destruction of Israel, the destruction of the USA. Nothing happens to him and I just think it's become so flagrant and so outrageous. And outrageously ridiculous that this was a good time not having to do with the elections. I think this will go on beyond the election. Actions. I would be surprised if it didn't but I think it's a very important thing for our nation. Very, very important. Yeah, please go ahead, please.

Just, just to clarify, who should be the Arbiter of what's hate? What's offensive? What should not be? Published what goes beyond free speech? And because so much of this you're banning has to do with comments. She made around January 6th just to clarify further. What did you do to stop the Insurrection? Is some people call it and why were you not able to stop it?

So that whole event unfortunate event. Just Through Congress and a report was issued and my name wasn't even mentioned and I appreciate that. I was surprised frankly because I would have assumed that they would have come up with are typically biased, at least on the Democrats side statement. The report came out as you saw two weeks ago, my name wasn't even mentioned. That was an unfortunate event. I say, though, however, people are being treated, unbelievably, unfairly when you look at people in prison and nothing happens to Antifa, and they burned down. Down cities and killed people. There were no guns in the capital. They burned, except for the gun that shot Ashley Babbitt, and nobody knows who that men were. If that were the opposite way, that man would be all over, he would be the most well-known and I believe I can say man because I believe I know exactly who it is. But he would be the most well-known person in this country in the world, but the person that shot Ashley Babbitt, boom. Right through the head. Just boom, it was no reason for that. And why isn't that person being opened up and why isn't that being studied? They've already written it off. They said that case is closed if that were the opposite, that case would be going on for years and years and it would not be pretty. So I just thought this was a very important time. You, please good. Go ahead, please.

If you're successful on this and Twitter and Facebook and Instagram, and all the social media platforms, let you back on and let everyone else back on uninhibited. The way that everybody has everyone's supposed to have access, would you use their platforms again?

I don't know. It's a good question, I don't know. I might not know I'm gonna different position because if I put out a press release you know I'm getting extremely good pickup but that's me. The world everybody that's getting banned as they can't put out. Press release people say, who the hell is that? Nobody's going to pick it up, and even myself, I could instantaneously get the word out. If somebody says a lie like the fake media, I can at least give the opposing side which had been doing for six years. I used to get great publicity before I ran for office. Okay? Well, I've been doing this for five or six years where I can get a word out and opposing word today, you can't do that. They took away the rights of in my A opinion, the majority. I really believe it's the majority because people aren't for all of these things. Now, they have voter ID. That's another one. When you talk about voter ID, all of a sudden they love voter ID. They fought it vehemently. I noticed, two days ago, I watched a congressman happened to be from South Carolina, saying, no. I've always been in favor of voter ID. Well, he hasn't because you look at his statement for listing years. He's been vehemently opposed but now they lie like nobody has ever lie. I watched him say.
Always believed in voter ID, essentially. And I said, that's unbelievable. Fortunately, the particular newscast had his statements from, before of which they were too numerous to put up at they put up enough of them. But the Democrats are now saying because they shows an 88 percent positive issue. They're now saying we believe in voter ID, we have to have voter ID. They have never risen one Democrat in the country. That said that, and in a year from now, the fake news is will say they've always been on this. It's amazing. If you say it long enough hard enough often enough. People will start to believe it. That's what happened with Russia. That's what happened with Ukraine. That's what happened with. Well, the worst is when they don't say it like the laptop from hell, they didn't want to. You look at that thing. That is, there is more criminal activity on that laptop and Al Capone had if he ever had a laptop would like to give Al Capone one but he was a baby compared to what I was able to see. Brooke. Would you like to say a few more words?

Can somebody join the lawsuit?

That's a good question...

Guy that you can join the lawsuit by going to take on BigTech.com. I did not plant that question, but I very much appreciate it. I take on big Tech.com and we really are looking for the tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands of Americans. And let me just say, one quick thing, I was a great question about the political ramifications of this lawsuit versus two years or four years. And certainly, it will be part of the national narrative. I think moving forward for the next couple of years. Years. But this effort really is about the Battle for the future of this country. And when we lose the opportunity to be part of a public discourse, whether as conservatives as Republicans as Libertarians as fighting against critical race Theory, as questioning masks and whether our 11, 13, 15, and 16 year olds, my children should be forced to wear a mask all day, whether we're questioning illegal immigration and how to use that. That's crazy. And it's not Okay, and this is not America and it is not the America that I know we all want for our children and our future grandchildren. And that's what this lawsuit is about. We have the best legal team in the country. The America First Policy Institute is partnering with them to ensure that the word gets out that we can truly, truly give our Americans who have been censored, who have been compromised, who have been told that they don't have a voice that will no longer be the case. So thank you. Thank you all.

I want to make one thing. Gentlemen asked, who would decide what's hate speech? Who would decide this thing for 200 years? Over 200 years, it's been the Supreme Court. We can't let it be in the hands of unelected people or on a point of justices. But they have done such a good job for 200 years on this issue. We don't need any panels, we don't need any oversight committees, we need the Supreme Court and the judicial, this your system to come into the 21st century.

That's all I want to thank everybody. It's about 94 degrees out, I'm sorry to do. This was supposed to be a beautiful day 72℃ and perfect, and it's a little bit hot. We can going to have refreshments strings. Will bring into the clubhouse if you'd like, but we'll take care of you because I see some of you are in serious trouble, sitting there, I do. I do hope I can leave you with two things. Number one, this is a very important lesson. This is a big-time long-awaited very very long awaited the complexity of it. I guess took a longer period of time. But other litigants also want to join in with us. And we have great confidence in the courts and we're going to see what happens. And the other thing I just asked the mainstream media to go back and do a network news and everywhere else is please discuss the horrors of what's going on in our in all cases, Democrat run cities. The hundreds and hundreds of people that are being killed on a weekly and monthly basis. So that people will do Do something about it by, you're not talking about it, you're not helping by Denis, you're not helping the Democrats, you're hurting the country. So I hope you can go out and just talk about the crime. Say, 260 people were shot in Chicago. It's a number. It's a stat put out by the city over the weekend. There's no war that we lost that many in for a long time and and many people died. Young, people and New York is a horror show. New York has the worst crime wave that they've had.
And nothing is done about it, except no bail. They let everybody out of prison. They just left. Almost 500 people out. They let them all out. They caused tremendous damage and harm, and physical harm to other people and death, and they let him out. If the people don't hear this, you'll never be able to solve the problem. It's a problem like this country has never had what's happened over the last six months in particular, and what's happening in certain cities is a horrible thing. It's an embarrassment to our country but more importantly it's just a horrible thing, the loss of human life on a weekly basis and you turn on these major newscast that a lot of people are watching and it's not even mentioned, you have to change, you got to get you.
It ability back. You don't have the credibility, you have to Back, I want to thank everybody very much and we'll be seeing what happens John? Good luck Pam, good luck, everybody. trish. I want to thank you for being so great. Really fantastic. I appreciate it very much. You've been so incredible. Thank you. And thank you to everybody. Thank you very much.

Posted at 2021/07/08(Thd) 18:18:30

政治・宗教・世界 | コメント(0) | トラックバック(0) | この記事のURL

この記事のトラックバックURL ->



「Transcript of Donald J .Trump and Constitutional Litigation Partnership」へのトラックバックのRSS